“They Robbed Him!” – Eddie Hearn Explodes After Crawford’s Controversial Victory

Boxing has never been short on drama, but the latest storm erupted not inside the ropes, rather in the aftermath of Terence Crawford’s most recent fight. When the judges declared Crawford the winner by decision, the reactions weren’t just divided — they were explosive. Leading the charge was renowned promoter Eddie Hearn, who delivered a scathing attack on the scoring, calling it “a robbery” and “a disgrace to the sport.”

VIDEO:

A Decision That Stunned Fans

The bout itself was closely contested. Crawford, known for his slick counter-punching and ring intelligence, was expected to dominate. Instead, his opponent pressed the action, landed heavy combinations, and appeared to outwork him in several critical rounds. Many ringside observers and fans online believed Crawford had been pushed to the limit — and possibly beaten.

But when the scorecards were read, Crawford’s hand was raised. The arena buzzed with confusion. Social media erupted with outrage. And Eddie Hearn wasted no time in voicing what many were already thinking.

Hearn’s Furious Response

“They robbed him!” Hearn declared in an interview immediately following the fight. His words were sharp, his tone fiery. “How can you give those rounds to Crawford? His opponent was the one landing the cleaner shots, the one pressing the fight. This is exactly why fans are losing faith in boxing — decisions like this.”

Hearn went further, accusing the judges of being swayed by Crawford’s reputation as one of the pound-for-pound kings of the sport. “You can’t win rounds just because your name is Terence Crawford. Boxing doesn’t work that way — or at least it shouldn’t.”

A Familiar Problem in Boxing

This wasn’t the first time questionable judging stole headlines. From Gennady Golovkin’s first fight with Canelo Alvarez to Manny Pacquiao’s infamous loss to Timothy Bradley, the sport has a history of controversies that cast shadows over otherwise thrilling contests. Each time, the uproar reignites the same debate: is boxing doing enough to ensure fair judging?

Hearn’s outburst tapped into that frustration. “We work so hard to make these big fights, to give fans what they deserve,” he said. “And then it all gets undermined by scorecards that make no sense. Tonight, the wrong man was given the victory, and everyone knows it.”

The Aftermath

In the days that followed, the conversation has been relentless. Fans have dissected the fight round by round, posting slow-motion clips and punch statistics to support their claims. Some insist Crawford did enough with his precision shots and defense. Others argue the challenger’s aggression should have swayed the judges.

Regardless of which side fans take, one thing is undeniable: controversy sells. The backlash has only intensified the spotlight on Crawford, while fueling demands for a rematch that could generate even more interest than the original bout.

The Verdict

Whether you agree with Eddie Hearn or not, his words captured the emotions of millions of fans who left the fight feeling unsettled. Was it robbery? Was it simply the subjectivity of boxing? The truth may never be unanimous, but one thing is certain: this decision will be talked about for years to come.

In boxing, every punch tells a story. This time, it wasn’t the punches but the scorecards that wrote the final chapter — one that left the world divided, and Eddie Hearn shouting the words many were thinking:

“They robbed him!”

The Night Efe Ajagba Shook the Boxing World with One Punch